Showing posts with label quentin tarantino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quentin tarantino. Show all posts

Monday, 17 February 2014

Favourite Quentin Tarantino Characters


I haven't really talked about my love/hate relationship with Tarantino. It basically goes like this; I really like most of his films, but I don't particularly like the man behind the camera. He just seems like a bit of a jerk. But I can't deny his influence on the film industry and I do genuinely enjoy the majority of his films. There are a couple I don't like as much, but that's more down to personal taste than anything else. And I do think he knows how to write some very interesting and memorable characters. So here's some of my favourites, because I haven't done enough lists already recently. Anyway, enjoy!

10. Mr Pink from Reservoir Dogs


In all honesty, if they released a film that was just Steve Buscemi complaining for 90 minutes, I would go and see it. I'm not the biggest fan of Reservoir Dogs, I think it's an okay film but not the most brilliant ever made, so I haven't seen that many times. But Mr Pink is pretty much the reason as to why I keep re-watching this film, and I think a lot of that is Steve Buscemi being awesome. It's also because his character is pretty much the only one who survives that we don't much about, except that he doesn't tip waitresses. And I always liked slightly mysterious characters as opposed to one where we know a lot of their back story. Also, Steve Buscemi.

9. Sex Machine from From Dusk Til Dawn


The only character to appear on this list from a film that Tarantino scripted rather than directed, and I have two words as to why he should on this list; crotch gun. Motherfucking crotch gun. Also, for a role that is so small, only Tom Savini could've played him with as much gusto to make him memorable. And you can tell that Savini is just having so much with the role. So yeah, not much to this character except an awesome name and a motherfucking crotch gun, but sometimes that's all you need.

8. The Wolf from Pulp Fiction


Harvey Keitel is one of those actors who can never be uncool, and Winston Wolfe is the epitome of cool. And he's the one of the only people who can talk down to Samuel L. Jackson and survive with his dignity intact. While the cleaner character has been used before (Tarantino has said that Jean Reno's character from La Femme Nikita was an influence), but I doubt he has ever been as suave as he is in Pulp Fiction. Even though he only appears for a brief time at the end, he is one of the best characters in the film.

7. Calvin Candie from Django Unchained


I don't know any other actor who could create a villain so sleazy, racist, disgusting (both ethically and physically) and yet still retain some atom of charm. Leonardo DiCaprio created a villain that everyone should've hated, and yet people couldn't help but like him. And I think that it's down to the performance. If it had been any less over the top and flamboyant, then I doubt people would've enjoyed this character as much as they. Certainly I enjoyed watching him, although there was this little voice in the back of my head telling me I shouldn't. But I did. Damn Tarantino.

6. Aldo Raine and Shosanna Dreyfus from Inglourious Basterds


Yeah, I couldn't choose between these two awesome people from possibly my favourite Tarantino film (there is still a debate going on in my mind). And I don't think you could have two characters who are as different as these two are. First up, Lt. Aldo Raine, a man who would rather bash you over the head with a machine gun than ask questions, whose incompetence when it comes to blending in is only matched by his enthusiasm for scalping Nazis. In short, a man who prefers strength over tactics. And then there's Shosanna Dreyfus, probably the only Jewish person to ever survive a visit from Hans Landa, and then, when the opportunity arises, concocts a revenge plot to kill off all of the most important officials in Germany by burning down her only source of economic security. And she almost gets away with it! Shosanna makes up for the subtlety that Raine lacks in bucket loads. If only Daniel Bruhl and his dimples hadn't interfered. 

5. The Bride from Kill Bill vols. 1&2


The Bride is one of those characters who always comes into my head whenever I think of strong female characters. And there are many reasons why. Getting attacked before her wedding by her former accomplices, falling into a coma for four years, having her baby taken away from her and waking up to find out that she's been repeatedly raped by one of the orderlies is enough to make anyone want to crawl into the ocean and never come out. But not the Bride, who instead goes on a massive revenge spree, taking out each of her former allies. She's not called the deadliest woman in the world for nothing.

4. Jules Winnfield from Pulp Fiction


Jules is another one of those characters who oozes coolness out of his boots, and part of that is due to the fantastic and iconic speech he delivers in two very different situations. It also helps that he's played by Samuel L. Jackson, who can be both threatening and charming at the same time. The segments that he's in are my favourite in Pulp Fiction, and it's mainly due to Jackson's complete presence. When he's on screen, you don't watch anyone else. At least, I certainly don't. And out of the multitude of parts he's had in Tarantino's films, Jules is by far my favourite.

3. O-Ren Ishii from Kill Bill vol. 1


I don't think I've yet had the pleasure to talk about how much I love Lucy Liu. I think she's one of the most awesome actors around, and it just takes her name to make me want to see something. I put O-Ren above the Bride partly for this reason, but also because I just love this character. Which a back story of revenge much like the Bride's, she becomes the head of the Tokyo Yakuza, and kicks arse in board meetings against idiotic douchebags.

2. Col. Hans Landa


The choice between number 1 and number 2 was a tough, but I went with my gut instinct and this is the result. Again, a villain no one should really like and yet he was the most popular character in the film, and Christoph Waltz won an Oscar for this. Of course, being played by someone like Christoph Waltz certainly helps. But the writing for this character also gives him something that Calvin Candie lacked; depth. There is something to this character that makes him intriguing, especially towards the end of the film. He's an opportunist of every sense of the word, and when he knows that the Nazi party is going to fail, he looks for a way out. Which makes him even more despicable, if you think about it. But this is what makes him different and ultimately one of the best characters that Tarantino has ever written.

1. Jackie Brown from Jackie Brown


I've talked about coolness throughout this list, but I don't think anyone can beat Pam Grier when it comes to being cool. So, if you hadn't already guessed it, Jackie Brown is also possibly my favourite Tarantino movie (that debates still going on). And it's mainly for this character, who I think is one of the smartest characters in the Tarantino-verse. When you consider how many people she manipulated to get what she wanted, and when she must've started planning all the events of the film, it makes you realise how cunning she really is. Apart from that, she feels like an actual person, having kick-ass moments then vulnerable moments, feeling confident one minute and scared the next. I love women who wield swords and defy physics with their fighting skills, but it's characters like this who I really love. Characters who feel like real people, and that's why Jackie Brown is number 1.

I'm going to have to do a proper blog on Jackie Brown one day. But until then, I hoped you enjoyed this, I hope I didn't piss too many people off. Keep in mind, these are my favourites, my opinion. And if you don't agree, then good for you. Until next time, readers.

Monday, 26 November 2012

Four Rooms (List Movie)


Tim Roth, what are doing? Why are you doing that? No one walks that way, seriously! What the fuck is going on!! ... This is an odd movie. You might even say it's a fucking odd movie. The idea is a good one, 4 directors are given 20 minutes to create a scenario based in a different room in a hotel involving the bell-hop (Tim Roth). But it doesn't work! This is a big fucking mess, so messy I'm already swearing too much in the first fucking paragraph! It's not the sort of movie you'd expect to see Tim Roth, I know that much. Though I've only seen him serious roles so I can't really talk. But we'll get to that later. Since there are four segments in the movie, this review will go through each of them in more detail. There may be spoilers, you have been warned.


Room one takes place in the Honeymoon Suite and is directed by Allison Anders, called The Missing Ingredient. A coven of witches meet to try and bring their goddess, Diana (Amanda de Cadenet), back to life after being turned to stone on her wedding night forty years ago. Each of the witches, Athena (Valeria Golino), Elspeth (Madonna), Jezebel (Sammi Davis) and Raven (Lili Taylor) have each brought the ingredient that they need in order to completed the spell. Eva (Ione Skye) was meant to bring semen as the final part, yet was unable to do so. The only way that they can complete the spell is to seduce Ted the bell-hop, and gather his semen whether he likes it or not.

Madonna was nominated for a razzie for her very brief appearance in this segment. But her part is so small that it doesn't really offend you, though she is quite bad. As an opening story, it's pretty good. The problem is that it's really quick, and because it's first, it runs the risk of being forgotten by the end of the film. And it is kinda forgettable. Except for Tim Roth. Now, in the other rooms, Tim Roth's acting isn't as noticeable because the other actors are overacting themselves, or the situations are more bizarre (yep) than this one, so the character becomes justified in being over the top. In this segment, the women seem to be going for more natural performances, so Tim Roth's overacting stands out too much. Overall, it is a different story, but isn't done well. The end result is something unfortunately more forgettable than it should be.


Now, the second room, directed by Alexandre Rockwell, has some funny moments, but this is definitely the strangest and least memorable of all the rooms. After getting a call for ice from one of the rooms, apparently room 404 where a party is taking place, Ted heads up with the ice only to end up at the wrong room and with a gun in his face. The gun belongs to Siegfried (David Proval), and he is waiting for his wife's lover, also named Theodore, to appear for him to threaten. His wife, Angela (Jennifer Beals), is tied and gagged, and Ted is forced to play out a psycho-drama with Siegfried becoming more and more unstable. Eventually, Ted manages to escape just as the real Theodore arrives. The segment ends almost exactly as it began, with a close up on the room number, with the last number scratched, leading the audience to wonder if it was indeed room 404.

So what's the main problem with this part? The pacing, to put it simply. It's too fast, too much happens in too short an amount of time. Which is odd, considering each segment lasts roughly around 20 minutes, but if a little more time had been taken to make things a little clearer then this would've worked better. And that's the other major problem that I had with the room, it was incredibly unclear what was going on. Looking back, all I can really remember are flashes of Tim Roth's expressions and Jennifer Beals with a gag in her mouth. Oh, and that part where Tim Roth is halfway stuck out of a window. While it kinda makes sense by the end, the payoff isn't funny or clever enough for you to really care. One interesting coincidence, though, is the Beals and Roth were reunited in the TV show Lie to Me, in which they played a divorced couple. The fangirl in me is pleased.



Anyway, we now move onto the best part of the movie, Room 309, The Misbehavers directed by Robert Rodriguez. Oh lord, the shit hits the fan here! A man and his wife (Antonio Banderas and Tamlyn Tomita) go off to a New Years Eve party leaving their two kids (Danny Verduzco and Lana McKissack) under the care of Ted, who is instructed to look in on them every half hour. I don't want to say anything else about this part. It's better if you're just surprised by the bizarre events that follow. Plus, too much happens to explain it very well in a paragraph. Unlike the previous segment, the Misbehavers uses it's time well, not dragging the plot through the mud but also not going 100 km an hour. Also, the ending line is excellent!

One of things that is kinda off putting about this part though, for me anyway, is that Ted's character changes for no good reason. While he wasn't the best bellhop in the previous segments, he becomes rather nasty, especially towards the children, who react to what happens to them naturally yet with a slight exaggeration. Ted just kinda acts like a dick in this part, and becomes more of a villain. But apart from the sudden gear change, which I can only put down to different directors and Ted having enough of the shit he's gone through already, this is an excellent short. If you see this without seeing any other part of the film, it still makes sense. And above that, it's fucking hilarious! If you don't want to watch the whole thing, then at least watch this part.


In between the Misbehavers and the Man from Hollywood (the Quentin Taratino segment) there is a little scene where Ted calls his boss, Betty (Kathy Griffin) to tell her about his night so far. But before he gets to speak with her, his call is answered by a stoner named Margaret played by Marisa Tomei. Yep, Marisa Tomei plays a stoner. This is my favourite character of the entire film. She is only onscreen for about 3 minutes, but for me she steals the picture. The clip is on youtube if you want to check it out, and do! Anyway, back to the plot, and onto Tarantino's contribution.


For his last job before he quits for the night, Ted is called to the penthouse suite where director Chester Rush (Tarantino) has asked for numerous and assorted items, including a block of wood, a donut and a 'hatchet as sharp as the devil himsel!' Ted brings these to the penthouse, where he is reunited with Angela from the second room, and he meets Chester's friends Norman (Paul Calderon) and Leo (an uncredited Bruce Willis), and he finds out why Chester has ordered such a random collection of stuff. He and Norman have a bet taken from an episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, where Norman has to light his cigarette lighter ten times in a row and he wins Chester's car. But if he fails to do so, then he has to relinquish one of his pinkies. Ted is asked to do the chopping, being offered $1000 in return.

The Man from Hollywood is the longest section, which is really why the first two rooms aren't as good as the second two. Tarantino demanded more time to tell his story, which meant that parts from the other rooms where cut out. This makes me dislike this section somewhat. Another thing that makes me dislike this room, is that the pacing is too slow. It takes about 15 minutes for Chester to tell Ted why he has brought him up to the penthouse, and then a further ten minutes to actually finish off the segment and movie. Of course, the time is filled with Tarantino's trademark references and swear-fests, but it doesn't work within this context. Again, if this had been a short all on its own, it would've worked better, but as a whole, it brings the movie to a complete stop. Though the ending is pretty funny and almost worth the wait. Almost.


Now, let's just take a quick look at the film as a whole. Does it work? Not really. Is it entertaining? Hell yeah! This is one of those messes that you dream would happen more often. Once you see it, you understand completely why it is a cult film. There's bad dialogue, cringe-worthy acting in parts, it's too long, incredibly pointless and it has Tim Roth in a comedic role. To be honest, Ted is the best and worst part of this film. The best, because his character is able to hold the film together and through some subtle hints in Roth's acting (though maybe subtle isn't the right word) you get a deeper character through repeat viewings. The worst, because his overacting is so funny as to be distracting from the rest of the film. Did I like it? Yes, in a way. It is odd to see Roth so animated when I'm used to him in more serious roles, but he is memorable. Also, the third room is an excellent short, and I will keep saying that.



Would I recommend it? Well, if this has sparked any interest, then seek it out. Otherwise, I'd say you should watch it for the so bad it's good quality that it has. It isn't for everyone, but if you like bad movies, then this should entertain you at some point along the line. Now, November is almsot over, I've completed my 50,000 words and hopefully I will be back on schedule to for some more reviews within the next few days. I'm not sure what I'll be reviewing, or when, but it will be something! Until next time, readers.