Showing posts with label dolly parton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dolly parton. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Mediocre Movies: Joyful Noise


Sometimes, you come across a film that just baffles you as to how it got made without anyone realising how much of a mess it was. This is one of those films. I wouldn't say it's so bad it's good, it's just ... odd. There are some plot points that don't make sense, characters that act insane, it feels edited to hell, and, the biggest crime, Jesse L. Martin is in this and he DOESN'T HAVE A SONG!!! Did I also mention this film is frustrating as hell?

So, in a small American town the church choir is run by two incredibly strong-minded women, G.G (Dolly Parton) and Vi Rose (Queen Latifah), after the old choir master Bernard (Kris Kristofferson) dies unexpectedly. The choir hopes to win the "Joyful Noise" choir competition in order to bring some much needed hope to a town that is quickly dying. However, Vi Rose wants to stick to the old traditional gospel songs that the choir has been doing forever, while G.G feels that it's time for a change. Throw in the fact that Vi Rose's daughter Olivia (Keke Palmer) is falling for G.G's bad-boy grandson Randy (Jeremy Jordan), which causes friction between mother and daughter, and coincidentally, the choir.


Okay, so to be honest, I was probably not this movies demographic. This is a very Christian film, which isn't a bad thing, but when I watch a movie I don't really want to be preached to. And this film can get quite preachy at times. It does try to address the big issues, mainly with the character of Walter, Vi Rose's son who has aspergers. There is one scene where he a crisis of faith, and questions his mother about why God made him the way he is, and that maybe God isn't as perfect as people make out. This would've been the best scene in the film, if Vi Rose's response had been anything other than "Don't question your creator, He is perfect and amazing," or something along those lines. The film does this a lot, bringing up issues and then resolving them in the most half-hearted way or not in any way at all. But that's not my biggest complaint.

No, my biggest complaint is this. When you have a movie about a choir, you expect the choir to actually be in it. Most of the plot revolves around the melodramas of Vi Rose's family rather than the dynamics in the choir, which is what it should be focusing on! The choir is hardly in it! We get a couple of subplots about a few of the choir members, but they're more played for laughs than for actual character development. And for a musical, it lacks a lot of musical numbers. Both Latifah and Parton have a solo song each, because they are the big stars. But it means that there is less time for the choir.


And let's get to the music. It's okay. The singing is excellent, and I'm fairly sure there might be some original songs (I could be wrong... I probably am), but like I said, this movie was not made for a non-Christian. What I mean by repeating that is it really rubs me the wrong way when someone takes an excellent song and changes the words to suit their own agenda. And good god do some of these covers make me cringe. How's this for a bizarre idea? A Christian reworking of Usher's "Yeah". It's as stupid as it sounds.

So is this film mediocre? Yes, but mainly because it is such a mess. It doesn't know what it wants to be. It's advertised as a light comedy, and yet apart from a few scenes, plays out like a drama. The dialogue is either cheesey or weird, with inspirational speeches alongside such brilliant one liners like "You will respect my snoring!" and "Your daughter is looking at Randy the same way I look at cake." Would I recommend it? No, not unless you are a really big fan of any of the stars. Otherwise, there are some much better choir movies, like Sister Act and Pitch Perfect, which coincidentally came out the same year. Like I said earlier, this is just average bad, so I'd steer clear of it, or watch it by some more dubious methods.

Well, I'm sick at the moment, so hopefully I will have another one of these up shortly. Or a list, I dunno yet. Until next time, readers.

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Questions Raised During "Nine to Five"


So, the Careless Love review which I promised at the end of the last blog will be coming, but I feel really shit this week, and so I don't think that I can be bothered to finish it. It may come out over the weekend, hopefully. And this is basically what went through my mind while watching the 1980 movie Nine to Five, or 9 to 5 depending on how much you can be bothered to type. So, this film is kinda funny and it's kinda stupid and it's kinda good. It's not bad, and actually kinda fun. Kinda. But there were some things that just sort of don't make sense to me. Or that I was confused by. I may look pretty stupid by the end of this. It's also in no real order, except the order in which they come into my head as I write this.


1. Couldn't the whole plot be over if Dolly Parton's character filed a sexual harassment suit against Dabney Coleman's character?


No, hear me out. I did a bit of reserach, and sexual harassment has been around since 1973-ish, but it wasn't really known about until the 90s. Even so, the bastard was firing people (mainly women, I don't think any of the male characters actually fired on screen) for no reason, or idiotic reasons. Anyone in his office could've made claim to some sort of harassment, but no! We had to watch a silly series of events whereby he gets locked in his own house by 3 of his employers! Anyway, back to the point, if everyone was so upset by him that he wasn't handing in good enough results, or just average results, then surely they could've gone to the big boss and complained. The proof is that when he was gone, there was a better workplace environment and better results. Anyway, I think this is my brain wishing for a slightly more serious comedy, instead of the frivolous romanticized, almost male fantasy-esque dream of gender equality.



2. (During Lily Tomlin's fantasy) That seems to be some top class animation going to waste. I wonder who animated it?


Ok, so for those who haven't seen the film, the three leading ladies get baked one night and tell each other the different ways in which they woud get rid of their boss (even the most legal way would be the best). Lily Tomlin's fantasy goes extra Disney as she imagines herself to be a loyal princess type thing complete with forest animals. Animated forest animals, that are very cutesy. But I can't find out who did the animation! And it's gorgeous! Of course, I could watch the film again, or fast-forward to the credits to find out, but if the internet doesn't know, then I'm guessing the film doesn't want us to know...

3. No one goes into his office for 6 weeks... ?


I know we aren't meant to take this film seriously, but honestly! The boss was hated so much that no one wanted to see him in his office for 6 weeks! Surely someone could've told the big boss that he was hated that much. Gah!

4. (With regards to Elizabeth Wilson's character) Can this woman get a life!


This isn't really a question. I just hate these sorts of characters that purely serve a stupid as purpose with no real character development apart from their bitchiness and stupidity. Stupid characters really piss me off, in case you haven't noticed.

5. Why couldn't we see the epilogues?


Seriously! The epilogues look a lot more interesting than half of the stuff we saw in the film! How did Dolly Parton's character become a country singer? (Oh, was that a joke. I didn't see it there behind the groaning) How does Dabney Coleman get lost and possibly eaten in the Amazonian jungle? Who is this Xerox representative that Jane Fonda goes off with? *Sigh* I guess that's what fanfics are for, but who would want to fanfic this.

6. What was their name?


You may have noticed that I haven't mentioned a single characters name. I can't remember any of them, only the actors. I don't know what that says about the power of the script or how endearing each character was, you can make up your own minds about that. But forgetting a characters name and only remembering they were in the film because of the person playing them... that can't be good!

and finally

7. That was Jane Fonda!?


I've only seen Jane Fonda in Barbarella. She doesn't look anything like Barbarella in this film. I didn't recognise her with clothes on.





So, this was stupid, but I had fun. Nine to Five isn't bad, I just expected something a little more realistic and less annoyingly stupid. (I think 'stupid' is the most used adjective in this review. Sorry for that.) So, I should hopefully have Careless Love out soon, I've almost finished the draft. Until then, keep your powder dry!